Compare the current and desired states using consistent measures, then separate the observed gap from possible causes and solutions.
Use a framework, clarify your thinking.
Find the right framework and learn to use it.
Define a problem
Answer eight planning questions to align the purpose, audience, execution, timing, place, and resource limits of an activity.
Investigate a specific event through successive causal questions, keeping each explanation tied to evidence.
Sort specific issues by what your team can directly change and what depends on someone else's decision, then plan a response for each.
Break a broad question into explicit branches so you can examine its parts and decide what to investigate next.
Connect an observed gap to a bounded improvement task, a target, and explicit constraints before scheduling a solution.
Sort tasks by importance to a stated goal and urgency of their timing, then agree immediate work, scheduled work, delegation, and reductions.
Compare eligible options against shared criteria and make the effects of your weights and ratings visible.
Trace one customer's task through touchpoints, actions and experiences, keeping evidence and unobserved stages visible.
Disaggregate a business into linked primary and support activities, then check cost boundaries and possible sources of customer value.
Place a topic in the center of a nine-cell grid and explore eight related directions before choosing ideas to develop.
Compare the benefits and drawbacks of possible actions against a shared goal.
Compare value hypotheses and implementation conditions on separate axes, retaining unknowns and hard-limit failures.
Connect an outcome to compatible counts and rates, specify the arithmetic, and keep targets and causal hypotheses separate.
Review acquisition, activation, retention, revenue, and referral with explicit events, cohorts, observation windows, and denominators.
Separate practices to keep, observed problems, and changes to try, then agree how to check the next experiment.
Connect a plan, recorded execution, a comparable check and a conditional next action in one review sheet.
List actual tasks, ownership, inputs, outputs, and time on a common basis before choosing a process to improve.
Compare resources and demand by session, then investigate allocation and practice differences before choosing a change.
Connect the problem and evidence to a proposed change, expected benefit, resources, implementation, and review.
Compare stated interests, demonstrated capability and confirmed requirements for the same tasks, preserving gaps and unknowns.
Discuss organizational need and personal willingness separately, then agree priorities, support, and task allocation.
Distinguish problems with basic working conditions from opportunities for achievement and growth, then plan and review both kinds of support.
Use stated willingness and demonstrated task skill to discuss support, retaining unknowns and explicit authority boundaries.
Clarify a goal, examine the current reality, explore options, and let the person choose an action and a way to follow up.
More scenario matches do not mean a better framework. Choose for your specific question.How to use the library