Fictional teaching practice pack. Replace all example inputs with your own material. Keep unknowns, ownership and approval status explicit. BLANK OUTLINE Decision needed and recipient authority: Recommendation or reason selection remains open: Feasible options and hard gates: Tradeoffs, conditions and contrary evidence: Facts, calculations, judgments and unknowns: Essential information in the main brief: Attachments and actual evidence locations: Request, owner, response date and time: Approval and next review: FICTIONAL MATERIAL AND WORKED STATEMENT Original fictional teaching material: the budget cap is CNY 20,000. A costs CNY 12,000, B 18,000, and C 26,000. Quality, speed, and cost have simulated ratings from 1 to 5, with higher scores better. There are no actual trial records, no selected supplier, and no confirmed owner, deadline, or approval. **Request.** Please confirm the mandatory quality requirements and whether to arrange comparable trials of A and B. The authorized owner, response date, trial effort, and approval remain open. This brief does not yet recommend buying from either supplier. **Current comparison.** Against a CNY 20,000 cap, A at CNY 12,000 and B at CNY 18,000 fit; C at CNY 26,000 is excluded. With simulated ratings, A leads at 40% quality weight, B at 60%, and they tie at 50%. The ranking depends on priorities and ratings that have not been verified. **Evidence needed before selection.** Confirm mandatory quality conditions. Compare A and B using the same requirements, observation method, and delivery points. Retain failures, revision costs, and record locations before updating the comparison. Simulated scores do not establish actual quality. **Response needed.** Confirm the requirements, comparison arrangements, owner, and dates, or identify what remains open. Authorizing a trial and purchasing from a supplier are separate decisions. Check: Can each claim be traced to evidence? Are proposals still marked pending? Does the main brief preserve conditions? Is one next action inspectable?